BIDREADY24
Start a preflight
UK public-sector tender preflight

Every requirement,
traced to source.

BIDREADY24 turns dense tender packs into a source-cited compliance preflight: what the buyer requires, what you can prove and what needs action before submission.

Start a preflight Explore a sample report
Fixed-price, one tenderNo invented evidenceReceiver-verifiable output
bidready24.com/project/••••••

Preflight overview

Civic Offices Cleaning Contract

ITT / 2026 / 041 · analysis in progress

Readiness

68/100

28

Requirements

7

Scored questions

3

Critical gaps

11

Attachments

Priority findingsEvidence state

Public liability insurance · £10m minimum

ITT §4.2 · p.7
Uncertain

SSIP accreditation or accepted equivalent

Selection form · Q12
Missing

Mobilisation plan · 1,000 words · 8%

Quality schedule · Q3
In progress

Built for teams working across common UK procurement portals

Download the tender pack from the buyer’s portal, analyse it in BIDREADY24, then use the traceable output in your existing bid process. BIDREADY24 does not claim direct portal integration.

A controlled workflow

From a 200-page tender pack to a traceable plan

The analysis can run autonomously. The provenance does not disappear: uncertainty, citations and decision history stay visible to the receiver.

  1. 01

    Upload the tender pack

    Add the buyer’s PDFs, Word files, spreadsheets and supporting schedules to a private project workspace.

  2. 02

    Add your evidence

    Tell BIDREADY24 what your business can prove. Unsupported facts remain missing or uncertain.

  3. 03

    Run the preflight

    The system extracts requirements, checks citations, maps evidence and records its decisions.

  4. 04

    Review and act

    Work through the assurance view, close gaps, export the register and control any configured external action.

What you get

A bid/no-bid view you can defend

Not another generic summary. BIDREADY24 creates structured registers that keep requirement, evidence and source together.

See the output format
01

Mandatory requirements

Pass/fail conditions, thresholds and caveats, each paired with the exact tender source.

02

Scored questions

Weighting, word limits, evaluation language and dependencies brought into one register.

03

Dates and attachments

Submission events, clarification cut-offs, forms, schedules, signatures and certificates.

04

Evidence gaps

Missing, uncertain and conflicting evidence ranked by consequence—not hidden behind confident prose.

05

Clarification questions

Specific buyer questions drafted where the tender is ambiguous or internally inconsistent.

06

Action plan

Owners, priorities and suggested internal dates assembled into a practical path to submission.

The non-negotiable rule

Nothing is invented.

A fluent answer is not the same as a supported answer. Customer facts begin as missing or uncertain and only move when supplied evidence supports them.

Read the trust model

Requirement

£10m public liability insurance

ITT §4.2 · p.7

Evidence

2026 insurance certificate

Customer upload · cert.pdf

Decision

Uncertain — limit not legible

Confidence 0.54 · review flag

Traceable by design

Requirement records carry source locations and exact excerpts where the extraction can establish them.

Autonomous, with boundaries

Internal analysis can proceed without step-by-step approval. External actions remain limited by the receiver’s configured mandate and available adapters.

Made for cleaning SMEs

Insurance, COSHH, mobilisation, TUPE, social value, safeguarding, KPIs and schedules are treated as operating requirements—not keywords.

One tender. One fixed price.

Know the work before you start writing.

See pricing Ask a question